Fix -h and add a README

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+
+# Rust 3x+1
+
+Simple tool to bruteforce 3x+1 for a second loop. Only takes positive numbers.
+
+
+## Usage
+
+```bash
+USAGE:
+    rust-3xp1.exe [OPTIONS]
+
+OPTIONS:
+    -c, --count <COUNT>     Number of times to try [default: 50000]
+    -d, --double-verbose    Weather to output current number every step of 3x+1
+    -h, --help              Print help information
+    -s, --start <START>     Number to start at [default: 195147905179352825856]
+    -v, --verbose           Weather to output current number each time
+    -V, --version           Print version information
+```
+
+
+## Demo
+
+![](https://files.buymymojo.net/ussgwsivh9co.gif)
+## FAQ
+
+#### What is 3x+1?
+
+check out [this](https://youtu.be/094y1Z2wpJg) viceo by Veritasium
+
+#### Why?
+
+This hasn't left my brain since I saw the video, I wanted to mess around with a tool to brute force for a new loop.
+

src/main.rs

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use tracing::{Level, instrument, event};
 use tracing_subscriber;
 use clap::Parser;
 
-/// Simple program to greet a person
+/// Simple tool to bruteforce 3x+1 for a second loop. Only takes positive numbers
 #[derive(Parser, Debug)]
 #[clap(author, version, about, long_about = None)]
 struct Args {
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ fn main() {
     event!(Level::INFO, "Starting number: {}", args.start);
     event!(Level::INFO, "Amount of numbers to try: {}", args.count);
 
-    if args.verbose{
+    if args.verbose & !args.double_verbose{
         for current_num in args.start..max_num{
             event!(Level::INFO, "Processing {}", current_num);
             let (smallest_num, largest_num) = txpo(current_num);